Independent profile. Not owned, sponsored or endorsed by Intel.

Intel Reviews, Complaints & Contacts

Intel Corporation, headquartered in Santa Clara, California, makes Core processors and other chips. This page quotes Intel's own processor warranty terms and the 13th/14th Gen extended warranty, the BBB and Trustpilot figures, and the court record of the Spectre/Meltdown and Downfall consumer class actions and the pending Raptor Lake class action, from Intel's SEC filing and court dockets. Complaints and lawsuits are allegations; the page gives no rating of its own.

REVIEWS & COMPLAINTS2on USAComplaints · none in last 3 yrs · latest 2008
WEBSITEintel.com
HEADQUARTERSSanta Clara, CA
PROFILE CHECKED2026-11-09
Submit a Complaint Read reviews & complaints ↓ Official website ↗

Contacts

PhoneAddress

Customer service & general contact

Corporate & press

Reference numbers (not support lines)

Other contacts

VERIFIED

Locations

  • Headquarters2200 Mission College Blvd Santa Clara CA 95054
EDITORIAL

Company Information

BBB, Trustpilot

Legal name
Intel Corporation
Founded
1968
Business type
Semiconductor company headquartered in Santa Clara, California (Core processors, graphics, networking and data-center products); Delaware corporation per its Form 10-Q
Website
intel.comSource: Intel Support home page, checked 2026-10-18
Headquarters
Santa Clara, CASource: Form 10-Q cover page: 2200 Mission College Boulevard, Santa Clara, California 95054-1549, checked 2026-10-18

Intel Corporation, a Delaware corporation founded in 1968, is headquartered in Santa Clara, California, files annual and quarterly reports with the SEC (Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 2026) and publishes warranty, support and ticket pages at intel.com and supporttickets.intel.com. The BBB profile shows an A+ rating without accreditation and the 64 / 11 complaint counts on this page; Trustpilot shows 2.1 from 154 reviews. Disputes in the record concern warranty handling, security-vulnerability class actions and a pending putative class action over 13th/14th Gen processors, which are described in the sections on this page as allegations and court outcomes.

EXTERNAL SOURCE

Independent Sources

Shown for context — not merged with USAComplaints' own numbers.

BBBIntel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA
6 reviews · 64 complaints · BBB business grade A+ · average customer rating 1 / 5
Trustpilot
154 reviews · TrustScore 2.1 / 5
CONSUMER ALLEGATION

Reviews & Complaints on USAComplaints

USAComplaints currently maintains 2 historical complaints about Intel, published in 2008. No approved complaints have been published on this site during the last three years. For a current reputation snapshot, see the independent sources on this page.

EDITORIAL

Complaint record: BBB, Trustpilot and our archive

BBB. On the BBB profile for Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, the page shows rating A+, "NOT a BBB Accredited Business", "64 total complaints in the last 3 years" and "11 complaints filed in the last 12 months", and a customer-review score of 1 out of 5 from 6 reviews. A separate BBB listing for Intel in Folsom, CA exists and is not combined here.

Trustpilot. The Trustpilot page for www.intel.com shows 2.1 from 154 reviews and an unclaimed profile; Trustpilot states it does not fact-check reviews.

Our archive. usacomplaints.com has 2 approved archive complaints from 2008 about Intel Corporation, one about a motherboard that stopped working and one alleging that a retail-boxed processor was treated as OEM and refused warranty service. These are allegations by their authors, who did not post evidence we have verified. Archive posts about other businesses with "Intel" in their names, and posts about PCs or retailers that merely mention an Intel processor, are not counted here. The three sources are separate measures and are not added together.

Had an experience with Intel? Tell other people what happened.

Submit a Complaint
EDITORIAL

Intel: processor warranty claims and the 13th/14th Gen extended warranty

People search for Intel complaints mostly about a processor that failed or became unstable and a warranty claim that was refused or slow. This section lists what Intel's own pages say today.

  • Standard warranty. Intel's Warranty Guide for Intel Processors (Last Reviewed 07/16/2026) says: "Intel Boxed Processors typically carry a three-year limited warranty" (some carry a one-year limited warranty). It says warranty periods for boxed processors "aren't extended except for 13th/14th Gen Vmin Shift Instability impacted" SKUs.
  • What a boxed-processor replacement needs. The same guide lists the processor name and number, the serial number (ATPO) and the batch number (FPO); proof of purchase and purchase date may also be requested. It says there is no need to return the fan heatsink with a warranty replacement.
  • Where to start. Intel's warranty-process video article links "Check Warranty Using Online Service Center" (supporttickets.intel.com/warrantyinfo) to check eligibility and whether a processor is boxed or tray, and "Submit a Warranty Ticket" (supporttickets.intel.com/servicecenter).
  • 13th/14th Gen desktop processors. Intel's community announcement of August 5, 2024 (carrying a note dated 9/25/24 that points to a newer root-cause post) describes a "two (2) year warranty extension - from date of purchase, up to a maximum of five (5) years" for the listed Intel Core 13th/14th Gen desktop boxed and tray processors, including previously purchased ones; the SKU list is published as an image in that post.
    More detailShow less

    The post says the coverage "applies to all customers globally" and that "Standard warranty process and terms apply". It says that for instability symptoms, owners of boxed processors should contact Intel Customer Support, owners of tray processors their place of purchase, and users of OEM or system-integrator systems the system manufacturer. For boxed-processor owners who had instability symptoms but "were unsuccessful in prior RMAs", Intel writes that it asks them to "reach out to Intel Customer Support".

  • Laptop chips. In its September 25, 2024 root-cause post Intel states that it "reaffirms that both Intel Core 13th and 14th Gen mobile processors" are "unaffected by the Vmin Shift Instability issue"; the extended warranty on this page is for the desktop processors Intel lists.
  • Update the BIOS. Intel's root-cause post of September 25, 2024 says it localized the Vmin Shift Instability issue to "a clock tree circuit within the IA core" and released microcode 0x12B through motherboard and system makers' BIOS updates; a May 2025 post adds microcode 0x12F and states that it "does not alter the root cause determination".
    More detailShow less

    The same post lists Intel Default Settings recommendations for 13th/14th Gen desktop processors as the mitigation for motherboard power-delivery settings that exceed Intel's guidance. BIOS availability depends on the motherboard or PC maker.

  • If the claim is refused. Keep the order record, serial/batch numbers and the case reference, and escalate through the BBB profile's complaint form or your state attorney general. Intel is not a financial company, so the CFPB is not the usual route.
EDITORIAL

Court record: consumer class actions about security vulnerabilities and 13th/14th Gen processors

Court records

Intel's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 2026 describes consumer class actions over the "Spectre" and "Meltdown" vulnerabilities: actions filed in various U.S. courts between 2018 and 2021 were consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, which "entered final judgment in favor of Intel in July 2022 based on plaintiffs' failure to plead a viable claim"; the Ninth Circuit affirmed in November 2023, "ending the litigation" in the U.S. The same note says a case in Ontario and a stayed case in Quebec relating to Spectre and Meltdown remain pending in Canada.

It also describes a consumer class action filed in November 2023 in the Northern District of California about the "Downfall" variant disclosed in August 2023: dismissed with leave to amend in August 2024; in August 2025 the court dismissed with prejudice the nationwide class claims under California law and denied Intel's motion as to alternative subclass claims under other states' laws; a second amended complaint was filed in October 2025 and Intel moved to dismiss it in December 2025. The CourtListener docket for Smith v. Intel Corporation, 4:23-cv-05761 (N.D. Cal.), filed November 8, 2023 as a class action complaint, shows an order of August 27, 2026 granting a motion to dismiss with leave to amend and a Final Judgment signed September 10, 2026. In that judgment the court states that plaintiffs elected to stand on their Second Amended Complaint and decline further amendment, dismisses the claims under Rule 12(b)(6) with prejudice and terminates the action. Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the Ninth Circuit on September 16, 2026, and the docket records a Ninth Circuit case number entry on September 22, 2026. The court's August 15, 2024 dismissal order in that case (Document 45) describes the complaint as alleging that in August 2023 Intel "publicly acknowledged a new vulnerability called 'Downfall'".

More on the lawsuitsShow less

Separately, a putative class action about Intel Core 13th/14th Gen (Raptor Lake) desktop processors, In re Intel Raptor Lake Processor Litigation, D. Del. 1:24-cv-01258, was filed on November 15, 2024 by purchasers who sue "on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated". Its original complaint alleges that the processors have a defect causing instability and damage and pleads counts including breach of express warranty and violation of Delaware's Consumer Fraud Act; these are plaintiffs' allegations. Amended complaints were filed in March 2025, Intel moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim in May 2025, and briefing on the motion was complete by July 23, 2025. The CourtListener docket lists no ruling on that motion and no termination as of October 19, 2026; its latest entry is a notice dated August 10, 2026 whose text was not available. A related case, Vanvalkenburgh v. Intel Corporation (D. Del. 1:25-cv-00128), was transferred from the Northern District of California in January 2025, and the Delaware docket records a stipulation and consolidation order on February 21, 2025 associating it with the lead case. Intel's position on the claims is not stated in the docket entries read.

This section covers the cases described in Intel's Form 10-Q and the dockets named on this page; it is not a list of every lawsuit involving Intel. Complaints and lawsuits are allegations.

PUBLIC RECORD

Court & Public Records

Spectre/Meltdown consumer class actions (consolidated in D. Or.)

Judgment

U.S. District Court for the District of OregonSource ↗

Judgment entered

Intel's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 2026 says class actions filed between 2018 and 2021 were consolidated in the District of Oregon, which entered final judgment in favor of Intel in July 2022 based on plaintiffs' failure to plead a viable claim, and that the Ninth Circuit affirmed in November 2023.

Smith et al. v. Intel Corporation (consumer class action over the "Downfall" vulnerability)

Dismissed

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaDocket 4:23-cv-05761Source ↗

Dismissed

Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the Ninth Circuit on September 16, 2026; see the separate appeal entry.

Case details: Smith et al. v. Intel Corporation (consumer class action over the "Downfall" vulnerability)Show less

The class action complaint was filed November 8, 2023. Intel's 10-Q (as of July 2026) describes earlier rulings: dismissal with leave to amend in August 2024 and, in August 2025, dismissal with prejudice of the nationwide California-law class claims while denying dismissal of alternative state-law subclass claims. The docket then shows an order of August 27, 2026 (Dkt 79) granting Intel's motion to dismiss with leave to amend, and a Final Judgment signed September 10, 2026 (Dkt 83). The judgment states that plaintiffs elected to stand on the Second Amended Complaint and decline further amendment, dismisses the claims under Rule 12(b)(6) with prejudice, and terminates the action.

Appeal in Smith et al. v. Intel Corporation (Downfall class action)

On appeal

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSource ↗

On appeal

The appeal is from the September 10, 2026 final judgment dismissing the claims with prejudice.

Case details: Appeal in Smith et al. v. Intel Corporation (Downfall class action)Show less

The Smith docket (N.D. Cal. 4:23-cv-05761) records a Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit on September 16, 2026 (Dkt 84), an entry titled "USCA Case Number" on September 22, 2026 (Dkt 85) and a transcript designation form on September 25, 2026 (Dkt 86). The Ninth Circuit docket number and any briefing or ruling were not verified; the district-court docket shows no later entry about the appeal's result as of October 19, 2026.

In re Intel Raptor Lake Processor Litigation (putative class action over 13th/14th Gen processors)

Filed

U.S. District Court for the District of DelawareDocket 1:24-cv-01258Source ↗

Filed — no final outcome recorded

The Vanvalkenburgh case on this page was consolidated into this docket in February 2025.

Case details: In re Intel Raptor Lake Processor Litigation (putative class action over 13th/14th Gen processors)Show less

Putative class action filed November 15, 2024 by six plaintiffs, five individuals and one company, "on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated" against Intel Corporation. The original complaint (Dkt 1) alleges a defect in Intel Core 13th/14th Gen (Raptor Lake) desktop processors causing instability and damage, and pleads counts including breach of express warranty and violation of Delaware's Consumer Fraud Act; these are plaintiffs' allegations, not findings. Docket entries show amended complaints on March 24 and 27, 2025 (Dkt 16, 17), Intel's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim with an opening brief on May 8, 2025 (Dkt 21, 22), plaintiffs' answering brief on June 23, 2025, Intel's reply and a request for oral argument on July 23, 2025 (Dkt 26, 27), and a "Notice - Other" on August 10, 2026 (Dkt 28, text not available). CourtListener shows no termination date and no ruling on the motion among the entries it lists, as of October 19, 2026.

Vanvalkenburgh v. Intel Corporation

Filed

U.S. District Court for the District of DelawareDocket 1:25-cv-00128Source ↗

Filed — no final outcome recorded

CourtListener shows no termination date as of October 19, 2026.

Case details: Vanvalkenburgh v. Intel CorporationShow less

Complaint filed November 5, 2024 in the Northern District of California (5:24-cv-07703) by Mark Vanvalkenburgh against Intel Corporation. On Intel's motion to transfer under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a), which the docket describes as unopposed, the court ordered transfer to the District of Delaware on January 29, 2025, and the case was received there as 1:25-cv-00128 on January 30, 2025. The Delaware docket records a stipulation and consolidation order signed February 21, 2025 and the case being associated with 1:24-cv-01258 as the lead case. The docket entries read do not state the claims; the text of the consolidation order was not available.

EDITORIAL

Intel Corporation: who operates the business

Intel Corporation is a Delaware corporation; its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 2026 gives its principal executive offices as 2200 Mission College Boulevard, Santa Clara, California 95054-1549 and reported 5,044 million shares of common stock outstanding on July 17, 2026. The BBB profile shows the same headquarters address and, in its raw page data, a business start of 1968-07-18 and incorporation of 1968-01-01.

Retail processors are sold "boxed" through retailers; "tray" processors are sold in bulk to system builders and resellers, and Intel's guide treats the two differently for warranty requests. For a PC bought from a computer maker, Intel's own post directs OEM and system-integrator customers to the system manufacturer first. This page covers Intel as the processor maker, not retailers or PC makers that use Intel chips.

EDITORIAL

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is the warranty on an Intel boxed processor?

Intel's Warranty Guide (Last Reviewed 07/16/2026) says boxed processors typically carry a three-year limited warranty, with some carrying one year. Its warranty lookup shows whether a given processor is boxed or tray.

Which Intel processors got an extended warranty?

Intel's community post of August 5, 2024 describes a two-year extension from date of purchase, up to a maximum of five years, for the listed Intel Core 13th/14th Gen desktop boxed and tray processors. The list of SKUs is in an image in that post, so check your exact model there and in Intel's warranty lookup. The post says the coverage applies to all customers globally under the standard warranty process and terms, and asks boxed-processor owners whose earlier RMAs were unsuccessful to contact Intel Customer Support. Intel states that 13th/14th Gen mobile processors are unaffected by the Vmin Shift Instability issue.

What does Intel say caused the 13th/14th Gen instability?

In its September 25, 2024 post Intel says it localized the Vmin Shift Instability issue to a clock tree circuit within the IA core and released microcode 0x12B. A May 2025 post introduces microcode 0x12F and says it does not alter the root-cause determination.

How do I start an Intel processor warranty claim?

Intel's warranty-process article links an online lookup (supporttickets.intel.com/warrantyinfo) and a warranty ticket form (supporttickets.intel.com/servicecenter). The Warranty Guide lists the details it asks for: processor name and number, serial number (ATPO) and batch number (FPO); proof of purchase may be requested.

What if my processor is a tray CPU or came in a PC?

Intel's August 2024 post says tray-processor owners should contact their place of purchase, and users of OEM or system-integrator systems should contact the system manufacturer. Boxed-processor owners are told to contact Intel Customer Support.

What happened to the Spectre and Meltdown consumer class actions?

According to Intel's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 2026, the consolidated U.S. cases in the District of Oregon ended in a final judgment for Intel in July 2022 and the Ninth Circuit affirmed in November 2023; cases in Ontario and Quebec are described as pending or stayed.

What is the status of the Downfall class action?

Intel's 10-Q describes the case as pending in the Northern District of California as of July 2026. The Smith v. Intel docket (4:23-cv-05761) later shows an order on August 27, 2026 granting a motion to dismiss with leave to amend, and a Final Judgment on September 10, 2026 that, after plaintiffs elected to stand on their Second Amended Complaint, dismisses the claims with prejudice. Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the Ninth Circuit on September 16, 2026, and a Ninth Circuit case number entry appears on September 22, 2026; the appeal's outcome was not verified.

What do Intel's BBB file and Trustpilot page show?

Intel's BBB file is listed under Santa Clara, California; it has been open since 1996 and is not accredited. On October 18, 2026 it showed an A+ letter grade, 64 complaints over three years, 11 of them in the past twelve months, and a 1-star average from only 6 customer reviews. On Trustpilot, the www.intel.com page has not been claimed by Intel and showed a TrustScore of 2.1 across 154 reviews. Each figure is the platform's own and is reported separately.

What warranty does an Intel Arc graphics card have?

Intel's Arc graphics card warranty article describes a three-year limited warranty for eligible Intel Arc and Arc Pro cards sold as standalone components in authentic Intel packaging. Cards inside OEM systems are subject to the OEM manufacturer's warranty. The article says registration is not required for warranty service.

Where can I find Intel stock information and SEC filings?

Intel runs an Investor Relations site at intc.com. It is titled Intel Corporation (INTC) and lists a stock quote, charts, historical data, dividends and buybacks, SEC filings, annual and quarterly reports, and financial results. Intel Corporation's filings are also on the SEC EDGAR system under CIK 0000050863.

Is Intel a scam?

Intel Corporation is a semiconductor maker headquartered at 2200 Mission College Boulevard in Santa Clara, California, and a Delaware corporation. It files annual Form 10-K reports with the SEC (CIK 0000050863, filings listed from 1994). Its BBB file is not accredited, and a putative class action over 13th/14th Gen processors is pending, as described in the Court record block on this page; claims in it are plaintiffs' allegations. Intel's support article on fake tech support calls says Intel Customer Support representatives do not ask for money for support services or for personal information, and only contact you after you have started an inquiry. Complaints on this site are customers' own accounts.

Is Intel legit?

Intel Corporation, founded in 1968, makes Core processors, graphics and other chips and is headquartered in Santa Clara, California. It is registered as a Delaware corporation and reports to the SEC under the ticker INTC. Warranty and support run through intel.com, with a warranty lookup at supporttickets.intel.com/warrantyinfo, a ticket form at supporttickets.intel.com/servicecenter and the Intel Support page, all listed in the Contacts block.

Is there a lawsuit over Intel 13th/14th Gen processor instability?

A putative class action is pending on the docket: In re Intel Raptor Lake Processor Litigation (D. Del. 1:24-cv-01258), filed November 15, 2024. Per the CourtListener docket, plaintiffs filed amended complaints in March 2025, Intel moved to dismiss in May 2025 and the motion was fully briefed by July 23, 2025; no ruling on it and no termination appear in the entries listed as of October 19, 2026. A related case, Vanvalkenburgh v. Intel Corporation (1:25-cv-00128), was transferred from California and consolidated in February 2025. The claims are plaintiffs' allegations, not findings.