Credit Glory

Independent Sources

Shown for context — not merged with USAComplaints' own numbers.

Contacts

• Credit Glory website (not loading on 2026-10-07): https://www.creditglory.com/
• Court-appointed receiver notice page (consumers): https://regulatoryresolutions.com/case/federal-trade-commission-v-credit-glory-llc-et-al-credit-glory-receivership/
• Receiver questions (name the company in subject): [email protected]

Locations

Credit Glory: what to do now (receiver notice, refunds, disputes, reporting; checked October 7, 2026)

Credit Glory is a credit repair company whose operations were suspended by a court-appointed receiver in August 2026. The Federal Trade Commission sued Credit Glory and related companies on August 3, 2026, and the court entered a temporary restraining order on August 4 and a preliminary injunction on September 4, 2026. The case is pending and the allegations have not been decided at trial. This section lists what the public record says about getting help; it was checked on October 7, 2026.

Contacting the company, cancelling and refunds.

• The company's website (creditglory.com) did not load when checked on October 7, 2026: Cloudflare returned error 1014 on www.creditglory.com and error 1000 on creditglory.com. This site therefore could not review the company's own terms, cancellation or refund pages, and does not state them.
• The receiver's notice page (Regulatory Resolutions, updated September 10, 2026) says the Credit Glory, Credit Sage, Credit Joy, Clerk Credit and Standard Scores businesses “will be permanently suspended” and “will not take any further action to dispute debts or contest items on your credit report.” The receiver's August 26 report says the phone accounts were suspended on August 12 and the numbers “are no longer functioning.”
• On refunds, the receiver's page says: “At this point, no refunds for the fees you paid to the Credit Glory entities are available. If the FTC prevails in the case, consumer refunds, if any, will be an issue for the FTC to resolve if there are sufficient funds collected from the defendants.” Questions can go to [email protected] with the company name in the subject line.
• Anyone who still sees charges on a bank account or card may ask the bank or card issuer what options exist; this site cannot say whether a dispute with a bank will succeed.

Credit reports and debts. The receiver's page tells consumers who want to keep disputing items that they may do so themselves and links the CFPB's dispute guide and the dispute pages of Experian, Equifax and TransUnion. The CFPB says: “You have the right to dispute errors on your credit report” and that fixing an error generally means contacting both the credit reporting company and the company that provided the information. The receiver adds that if you wish to pay or discuss debts listed on your credit report, you should contact the creditors directly.

Where to report. The FTC takes reports at ReportFraud.ftc.gov. The CFPB accepts complaints about credit repair and debt collection services; the CFPB's public database lists 86 complaints naming “Credit Glory LLC” as of October 7, 2026 (see the complaint record section). Your state attorney general's consumer protection office is another route.

If you meant to reach a debt collector. The FTC alleges Credit Glory used paid search ads so that people searching for debt collectors or creditors reached its telemarketers instead. Take a collector's or creditor's phone number from your own letter, credit report or court papers rather than a search result, and ask the caller to state the business name.

FTC lawsuit, receivership and preliminary injunction (checked October 7, 2026)

FTC v. Credit Glory LLC et al. (U.S. District Court, District of Arizona, No. 2:26-cv-05387-SPL, Judge Steven P. Logan). The FTC filed on August 3, 2026. Its complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act, the Credit Repair Organizations Act (CROA), the Telemarketing Sales Rule, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act and the Electronic Fund Transfer Act. The FTC's press release of August 10, 2026 says the operation took in “nearly $200 million” through up-front and monthly charges; the complaint itself states consumer injury of “at least $172.5 million.” These figures are the FTC's allegations.

The advance-fee rules the FTC relies on. The complaint describes CROA as prohibiting a credit repair organization from charging or receiving money for a service it has agreed to perform before the service is fully performed (15 U.S.C. § 1679b(b)). It also relies on the Telemarketing Sales Rule's limit on advance fees for services that promise to remove negative information from a credit report (16 C.F.R. § 310.4(a)(2)). The FTC alleges the defendants charged a first fee of about one dollar and then a set-up fee before dispute work was done, charged monthly fees without clearly disclosing them, and that telemarketers tricked callers into believing they were talking with debt collection entities or creditors.

Orders so far. On August 4, 2026 the court entered a sealed temporary restraining order that froze assets, appointed Thomas W. McNamara as temporary receiver and set a show-cause hearing; the FTC announced the case on August 10. After a hearing on September 2, 2026, the court on September 4, 2026 granted the FTC's motion for a preliminary injunction and denied the defendants' motion to dissolve the restraining order. The court found the FTC likely to succeed on its claims that the defendants charge illegal advance payments and use deceptive and misleading practices, and it continued the asset freeze and the receivership. A preliminary injunction is not a final judgment; the court will decide the case on the merits later.

Defendants' position. In their August 20, 2026 opposition, the defendants said the FTC's motion should be denied, that the company had “successfully served thousands of customers” over a decade, and that, according to a declaration from Marko Petkovic, 91 percent of customers enrolled six or more months had at least one negative item removed, with an average of over 11 items. They also cited a written compliance program and a refund policy. The court's September 4 order says the defendants “did not meaningfully counter” the evidence that payment was received before services were fully completed or that search ads using debt-collector keywords led consumers to believe they were contacting those agencies.

Appeal. The district court docket lists a notice of interlocutory appeal on September 14, 2026; the Ninth Circuit opened appeal No. 26-5991 on September 15, 2026 with the FTC as appellee and a briefing schedule of October 13, 2026 for the opening brief and November 10, 2026 for the answering brief. The accessible Justia copy of that docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2026 and showed no decision through that date; current appellate status was not established from the accessible sources on October 7, 2026.

Later district-court filings. CourtListener's docket listing, opened October 6-7, 2026, labels entries including “Show Cause” (Doc. 91, September 23), “Order on Motion to Show Cause” (Doc. 97, September 28), “Response to Order to Show Cause” (Docs. 112 and 113, October 5 and 6) and “Extension of Time” (Doc. 114, October 6). Only these labels were read; the contents and any current contempt or show-cause status were not reviewed or established.

Related receivership registrations. The receiver also registered the appointment in two other districts: the District of Nevada docket (No. 2:26-ms-00033) lists “APPOINTMENT of Receivership in Other District” on August 13, 2026, and the Central District of California docket (No. 2:26-mc-00074) lists a “NOTICE OF RECEIVERSHIP (Pursuant to 28 USC 754)” filed by the receiver on August 13, 2026. These are ancillary filings in the same FTC case, not separate enforcement lawsuits.

Who Credit Glory is and how its related companies are named

What the company is. BBB lists “Credit Glory, LLC” of Henderson, Nevada under Credit Repair Services, with Marko Petkovic as President/CEO, a business start date of August 1, 2016 and a file opened May 19, 2022 (dates from BBB's page data). BBB's description of the business, supplied by the company, says it offers “personalized services, including credit report analysis and dispute assistance.” BBB does not accredit it.

Related names. The FTC's complaint names three separately formed companies called Credit Glory LLC (Delaware, Wyoming and Nevada), Credit Glory Inc. (Delaware), and other defendants including Credit Sage LLC, Joy Credit Software LLC, Clerk Credit Systems LLC and Standard Scores LLC. The court's September 4 order describes, from the FTC's filings, nine consumer-facing entities operating as Credit Glory, Credit Sage, Credit Joy, Credit Clerk and Standard Scores, plus eight lead-generation entities; that grouping is the FTC's allegation. The defendants' response says that when the order was entered the only operating entities were Credit Sage, Credit Glory, Credit Clerk and Standard Scores, and that the others were not operating.

How the service worked, as alleged. According to the FTC's complaint, people who searched for information about a debt reached telemarketers who sold a credit repair plan of dispute letters. The FTC says telemarketers typically asked for a one-dollar charge first, then a further up-front fee of typically hundreds of dollars, then monthly fees of typically $90 to $99 to the defendants plus $24.95 or $24.99 to Standard Scores, which the telemarketers described as a third-party credit monitoring provider; the receiver's report says the dollar was charged in the name of Standard Scores. The company's court filing describes the service differently: that it identified and disputed inaccurate, unverifiable and outdated information with the credit bureaus, and that customers were told results could not be guaranteed.

Operating status. On the receiver's report dated August 26, 2026, the business was run remotely with no physical headquarters and the receiver concluded it “cannot operate legally and profitably” and suspended operations under the court order. This is the receiver's judgment as reported to the court.

Complaint record: BBB, CFPB and Trustpilot as displayed on October 7, 2026

Counts below are as displayed or queried on October 7, 2026 and come from different sources with different methods; they are not added together.

BBB. BBB's profile for Credit Glory, LLC, Henderson, NV shows rating F and “NOT BBB Accredited.” BBB lists “Failure to respond to 8 complaint(s)” and “270 complaint(s) filed against business” as reasons for the rating; the complaints tab says 269 total complaints in the last 3 years and 53 closed in the last 12 months. The reviews tab shows 4.49 out of 5 across 893 customer reviews, which BBB says are not used in the letter grade. The first page of displayed complaints (July and August 2026) includes accounts of charges for dispute services that consumers say they did not understand, difficulty reaching the company to cancel, and consumers who say they believed they were calling a collection agency. In two answered complaints, business responses dated July 29, 2026 say its role “was limited to preparing dispute correspondence” and that it cannot assure any particular result because credit bureaus and creditors decide disputes.

CFPB. The CFPB database lists 86 complaints for “Credit Glory LLC,” first received May 31, 2022 and most recently September 8, 2026, with 37 received since October 7, 2025. The products most often selected by consumers were Debt or credit management (55), Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports (10) and Debt collection (10). The most frequent issues were Charged upfront or unexpected fees (22), Didn't provide services promised (18) and Confusing or misleading advertising or marketing (12). Company responses were Closed with explanation (60), Closed with monetary relief (7) and, for 19 complaints, a response flagged as untimely. These are consumer-submitted complaints and the CFPB does not verify them.

Trustpilot. The Trustpilot page for www.creditglory.com shows 10,012 reviews and 4.4, a claimed profile since February 2022 with a paid Trustpilot subscription, and the notice “No recent history of asking for reviews.” Trustpilot says it does not fact-check reviews. The defendants' August 2026 court filing cites more than 24,000 Trustpilot reviews; that figure differs from the count displayed on October 7 and the difference was not reconciled.

Receiver's sample of complaints. The receiver's August 26 report says the businesses received “dozens of BBB Complaints and 1-star Trustpilot reviews” and attaches samples; it also reports that, under a May 2026 internal policy, refunds were to be granted only if a client threatened the company with the CFPB, FTC, a lawyer or an attorney general, and that the set-up fee was treated as non-negotiable. These are the receiver's descriptions of company records in a court filing.

Financial figures in the receiver's report. Per the company's QuickBooks records as read by the receiver, sales by five consumer-facing entities from inception through July 2026 were $205,490,354, distributions to the individual defendants from 2022 to early August 2026 were $58,149,554, and consolidated assets in July 2026 were $984,907. The receiver says the review was preliminary and not a technical audit.

This site holds no complaints of its own about Credit Glory as of October 7, 2026.

Is Credit Glory Legitimate?

Credit Glory is an identifiable business: BBB lists Credit Glory, LLC at a Henderson, Nevada address with Marko Petkovic as President/CEO, and the Credit Glory entities are named defendants in a pending FTC enforcement action in federal court. A federal court granted a preliminary injunction on September 4, 2026 that continues an asset freeze and a receivership over the defendants, and the receiver has suspended the business. BBB rates it F and does not accredit it. The FTC's allegations and the court's preliminary findings have not been tried to a final judgment, and the defendants dispute the FTC's account; their court filing cites positive customer outcomes and positive Trustpilot reviews. The court has not entered a final judgment on the FTC's claims; the preliminary findings and the defendants' disputed assertions should not be treated as final determinations.

Court & Public Records

Company Relationships

• Affiliated with: Credit Sage LLC
• Affiliated with: Standard Scores LLC
• Affiliated with: Clerk Credit Systems LLC
• Affiliated with: Joy Credit Software LLC

Frequently Asked Questions