SBC California
Ripoff Refusal to delete charge for unwanted access to interstate calling Does FCC really require this charge regardless of want, need, or use?

Shops, Products, Services

I have two residential phone lines with SBC California. One is used for long distance intra and interstate calling. One is not. I asked that the interstate access charge of $4.49 per month be removed from the billing for one number as Iwould not be using that line for interstate calling. The SBC representative refused to delete the charge on the basis that this charge was mandated by the Federal Communications Commission. I can well understand that this may be true for those who call interstate, but I find it both unfair and illogical to charge this fee to someone who is not going to use interstate access. To do so is a ripoff. Please advise me if the FCC requires this charge regardless of want, need, or use. Thank you.


Company: SBC California
Country: USA
State: California
City: South San Francisco
Address: P.O. Box 9039
  <     >  

RELATED COMPLAINTS

Allied Interstate Collections
Allied Interstate Collection #1 On Ripoff Rude Scum vulgar rude scum illegal deceptive collection practice liars try to harrass intimidate lambast insult and degrade. It's their job

Allied Interstate
A Little Secret About Allied Interstate

Allied Interstate
Violating calls

Allied Interstate
Harassing calls

Allied Interstate
Ripoff dishonest fraudulent billing Florida

Allied Interstate
Ripoff!

Verizon
Ripped off, lied to, and 3rd line installed doesn't work ripoff business from hell Inglewood

Allied Interstate
Allied Interstate Calling place of employment and informing co-workers nature of calls

Allied Interstate
False information given to me

Allied Interstate
Screwed up my credit over $65. Oo and i did not know