Remax
Deceptive agent practice

On February 4, the initial record contract for my home involved a spa, respected at $8,000.00.

On or around Feb 27, I came across the MLS home listing (R132568A) demonstrated about the RE/MAX site didn't display the new bath or show the new bath included in the record. At the moment, I named RE/MAX and informed them the spa wasn't proven included in the record. I talked to RE/MAX broker TINA COVEY and he or she assured me the spa was area of the home record.

On February 27, I obtained A Contact from RE/MAX (via TINA COVEY’s E-Mail) that suggested “I included spa under external characteristics. It had been previously mentioned in broker comments with above-ground pool.”

On January 8, I obtained A Contact from TINA COVEY record concerns from the prospective customer. Among the questions requested was if the spa was to stay using the home. I replied to TINA COVEY the spa was area of the unique record.

On January 10, at 11:44 am, I obtained a mobile call from TINA COVEY. She mentioned that someone questioned her to consider the new bath off the record. She accepted that she fooled me by eliminating the new bath in the record without my understanding. She further mentioned when I really could not trust her then I ought to fire her.

On January 10, I obtained A Contact from TINA COVEY having a new record including the new bath. Nevertheless, the present listing about the RE/MAX site nevertheless demonstrated no spa with no indicator of the spa included in the record. It wasn't actually outlined within the outside functions at this time.

It's obvious the RE/MAX broker deliberately was attempting to prevent detailing the new bath such that it might be deceptively taken off the home and never participate the initial purchase.

Company: Remax
Country: USA
State: New York
City: Plattsburgh

  <     >