Wells Fargo
Sm scraches on a vehicle considered excess wear in the amount of $784.08

Cars & Transport

My lease maturity date w / Wells Fargo was 1/7/09. On 12/1/08, I bought a Nissan Rogue from the same dealership that I bought my Murano. When I bought the Rogue, I was told that I had to contact Wells Fargo to have the car picked up as the dealer could not take it. I thought that was really odd, especially when I bought the car from the same dealership & the 05 Murano only has 28K mi. & in pristine condition. On 12/2/08 I contacted Wells Fargo to let them know that I purchased a new car & needed to make arrangements to have the Murano picked up. I was told the car would be picked up in 3-4 days. I also asked if I needed to be there when the car was picked up for inspection purposes & was told "no". I received a bill from Wells Fargo dated 12/30/08 that my lease matured & Im responsible for the following items: 1) Turn in fee of $430.16 & 2) Excess Wear & Use (Damages) of $784.08= $1212.24 total. There was no itemized explanation as to what EXCESS Wear & Use (Damages) that they were referring to included. On 1/9/09, I called Wells Fargo to get a detailed explanation of what was considered EXCESS Wear on the Murano. I articulated that there was absolutely no Excess Wear on the Murano. The mgr at the dealership looked at the vehicle & said it was in great condition too. I was told there were 3" scratches on both the front & back bumper & based on their wear & use guidelines that exceeds what is called Normal wear & instead is considered EXCESS. I advised I wasnt aware of any scratches on the bumpers. I was asked if I took pics, which I did not; I was buying a new car. I also asked if they took pics & they said the auditor's do but they don’t see them nor do they share them. Im being asked to pay a bill for damages that I'm claiming that are not there, but I cant see what they are referring too? What are they trying to hide? Excess Wear to me isn’t sm. Scratches; thats normal wear. Here Im thinking that Im rewarded for having good credit w / a lower interest rate, but in the end Im getting nickel & dimed for scratches which are defined by Wells Fargo as EXCESS Wear totaling $784.08!


Company: Wells Fargo
Country: USA
  <     >  

RELATED COMPLAINTS

Wells Fargo
Threatened to ruin credit but refuse to show evidence of damage

Wells Fargo Auto Finance
Consumer Report

Wells Fargo Auto Finance
They accepted a fraud contract with excess value of vehicle increase interest

Americas Servicing Company
Fraud

Wells Fargo Bank Home Mortgage
2nd time using Wells Fargo and we still LOVE them

Wells Fargo Auto Finance
Excessive wear and tear charges that are completely false. Newbury Park, California

Wells Fargo
Credit Card Lunacy

Wells fargo dealership services & busy bees auto sales
Consumer Report

Wells Fargo Financial Auto Finance
Wells Fargo will not apply payments in excess of your minimum monthly payment to your principle Las Vegas

Wells Fargo Bank, Los Angeles, California
Issued Credit Took it Away