Credo
Faulty phone & dishonest dealing

I dropped my LG 350 phone, and Credo provided a cheaper phone, LG160. After I eliminated the battery cover, it mightnot be changed. Credo changed the telephone. While it got dispersed with water, I got it to some telephone shop where they eliminated the battery cover to ensure it had been dried, plus they could not substitute the address. And so I've recorded it in position. Then I came across the LG350. I called Credo about incorporating the discovered telephone to my bill. The sellers explained the conditions, and that I repeated them back again to him 3 times during our discussion: $60/month for 550 anytime moments discussed from the two telephones. To displace the LG160 using the deteriorating battery cover he involved a brand new and various telephone, (Katana LX), which he explained Credo clients had recognized. And so I decided to the agreement. Then I acquired an email communication with my purchase confirmation. The regular cost outlined is approximately $70, and there is a observe that this doesn't include fees. I called Credo again, and without my asking they related me having a "supervisor", J.D., who contended with me the purchase claims $69.98, not $70, as though this described the $10/month distinction between what I'd decided to and the things they established within the email. He continuously interrupted me, and was usually unhelpful. I'm VP of Regulatory Affairs and Quality to get a biotech organization, and so I may state that he's possibly badly competed in his work capabilities or he's insufficient for that placement. Then your LG150 using the defective battery cover went dead, and that I do not have anymore time for you to waste on Credo.

Company: Credo
Country: USA
State: California
City: Berkeley

  <     >