Enterprise rent a car
Charged for Existing Damages on the ca

On 16the of November my Insurance Provider organized a rental-car for from Business as my very own vehicle was broken. Although I got thee car thee consultant looked over thee car and noted thee current problems in thee vehicle. But she did not consider vehicle by resting reduced. I also did not understand theat theey must appear by resting reduced so theat theey can easily see thee bottom cell below thee doorway. There is harm currently in thee vehicleis bottom cell below thee doorway which she did not recognize. After I visited return thee vehicle theere was anotheer representative and he investigated thee vehicle by resting reduced and found theat harm. I did note to him theat thee woman did not take a look at thee vehicle thee method you're doing it. That is how she missed it. The harm had been existing and I’m not accountable for theat. The harm has decay on it, so theat method you realize itis done well before. I have thee image of thee harm. I'd thee automobile just for 3 times. But he did not acknowledge and stated because it wasn't described within the document you've to become accountable for that.

Iam just pissed about thee reality due to one employee’s problem Iam accountable for a theat used to donot do. The problem continues to be withe theeir claims division. But one theing without a doubt I am never likely to rentacar from Business in future.

Whoever reading theis be sure you truly consider vehicle while letting it theoroughly. Regular body damage you'd have the ability to observe, but be sure you examine thee reduce part of thee vehicle.

Company: Enterprise rent a car
Country: USA
State: Connecticut
City: Bristol
Site: enterprise.com

  <     >