Geico
Absurd Insurance Ruling

I had been struck with a Geico Covered driver who had been rushing and went a red-light in Atlanta, GA. (Three trusted witnesses, another driver obtained a quotation, we're awaiting the court day). Geico has accepted that their driver was to blame, but is just taking 90% of the responsibility, stating that I'm 10% responsible for "not having the ability to stay in time for you to steer clear of the crash". A lot like saying it's partly your personal problem to get chance, since you did not duck quickly enough before getting hit from the topic.

Our insurance provider (Allstate) has decided another driver is 100% to blame, but appears reluctant to consider the problem to settlement since I didn't have accident insurance on my automobile. I believe they'd rather perform a 10% payment to protect another driveris problems in the place of fighting for my complete payment from Geico.

I've noticed that Geico employs techniques such as this to wait choices and steer clear of funds (they've previously postponed the judge day one more 8 weeks, and also have overlooked my problems by 60% when compared with a completely independent estimator).

Our current problems revolve around towing and storage costs for my totalled car... Because Geico has just approved partial obligation, they're just ready to pay me AFTER I spend the pull ton. I can not afford to consider the vehicle out-of storage, and also have been recommended that I can not market the name to pay for these costs that are accumulating daily. I believe Geico is wishing to hold back this out before vehicle is reported forgotten... But I merely have no idea how to proceed next. Any recommendations?

Company: Geico
Country: USA
State: Georgia

  <     >