Shorttask, A. Harrison Barnes, Lawcrossing, Hound, Employmentcrossing
A Harrison Barnes Uses Shorttask Company to Launch False Endesorments for Lawcrossing, Hound, Employmentcrossing

Shops, Products, Services

The FTC today finally ruled that blogsters who are paid to post reviews on products or services must now disclose the fact they were paid or face penalties up to $11,000 per infraction. This action by the FTC formalizes its long-standing belief that a lack of such disclosure violates consumer protection laws because such blog comments amount to undisclosed paid endorsements amounting to fraudulent and deceptive advertising.
The first indication that A. Harrison Barnes either paid people to post positive comments about his companies or asked people to post positive comments even if they were unfamiliar with the service first surfaced in 2008 in a blog posting by Cathy Gellis who confirmed that Mr. Barnes manipulated Amazon's mTurk service to enlist individuals to "plant" false positive comments about Barnes's companies. Ms. Gellis worked with Amazon to effectively bar Barnes from further use of mTurk. Since that time, scores of other similar incidents appeared on other websites.
In response to having been caught in his deceptive practices, A. Harrison Barnes then launched a virtual carbon copy of mTurk called Shorttask and used this site to pay thousands of people to plant comments and links that would make his companies appear to be much more effective, positive and favorable than the general view of other more reputable sites. Shorttask has been widely criticized as a deceptive and manipulative tactic to counter the rising tide of complaints against both he and his companies. (It should be noted that during the same period Barnes decided to sue individuals who posted negative comments about both he and his companies claiming $10 million in damages).
The latest move by the FTC merely formalizes what people have long known - that A. Harrison Barnes is willing to engage in questionabe, and probably illegal, consumer tactics to mislead the public as to the nature and poor quality of his companies and their services.
NYT Article: [www.nytimes.com/aponline/10/05/technology/AP-US-TEC-Bloggers-FTC.html]
FTC Statement: [www.ftc. Gov/opa/10/endortest. Shtm]


Company: Shorttask, A. Harrison Barnes, Lawcrossing, Hound, Employmentcrossing
Country: USA
State: California
City: Pasadena
Site: www.employmentscape.com
  <     >  

RELATED COMPLAINTS

A Harrison Barnes -ShortTask -Employmentcrossing, Lawcrossing, Legal Authority, Employment Authority
Lawcrossing Account Charges Scam

Harrison Barnes-hound.com
Ceo of hound.com be aware of internet scam - company refuses to provide consumer refunds

Bill Barnes
Do not order from bill barnes! Bill Barnes owes me $5500!

"A1books" a Barnes & Noble book seller
A1books a Barnes & Noble book seller Apparently this seller has a habit of changing the company name to cover up fraud. Turtle speed shipping, and sold books that don't exist

Employment Crossing - Law Crossing - Legal Authority - EmploymentCrossing
Employment Crossing - Law Crossing - Legal Authority Scam Fraudulent Business Practices Unethical business Email spam

Barnes and Noble
Won’t Cancel my Orde

Stuart Barnes
Theft

Clear Credit
Credit Repair ripoff, fraudulent billing, deceptive advertising, unauthorized billing, scam

Barnes and Noble
Gift Return

Barnes&Noble.com
Consumer Report