Certegy
Violation of FACT ACT, Fair Credit Reporting Act

I published a $351.00 check to Toysrus on October 26. The check was rejected by Certegy. The worker at Toysrus named the organization and explained they'd suggested the check have been rejected since I'd created way too many inspections about the consideration. I advised the supervisor that I endless check-writing capability about the consideration and had just created one check up on the consideration within the last month, anything was incorrect. I named Certegy in the shop and was informed they could not tell me why I had been rejected. I needed to understand what it had been to ensure that I really could repair it if there is a mistake.in breach of the REALITY Work they advised me they couldn't inform me what my document had onto it which was flagged. Whilst the department supervisor of the neighborhood lender, acquainted with THE VERY FACT work this angered me. I told them-this was illegal. They extended to provide me an enormous run-around and that I suggested they obtain info directly simply because they were requesting case. Moreover, I needed to make sure that additional lender clients weren't having related issues. I've read some info today about just how many others are experiencing related issues and that I do wish that Certegy encounters a-class action suit. There's no justification for splitting regulations.

Company: Certegy
Country: USA
State: California
City: Elk Grove/Sacramento

  <     >