Lloyd & McDaniel, PLC For Asset Acceptance
Filed Civil Charges

Business & Finance

This is the conclusion I've written to use in court the 19th of this month. There's been a lot of sleepless nights to say the least. I can't believe this is happening.

Without offering or defining any validation right to the Defendant, there should be no claim against the Defendant. The pursuit of this case without offering any timely account validation (s), such as, original Creditor's address, relevant account date (s), account number or even verifying a billing address; "Plaintiff's Exhibit A" is baseless. Additionally, expecting this Honorable Court to find the Defendant liable for any debt because their original denial was "too general", ignores relevant law protecting the consumer and the Defendant's original desire to settle this matter outside Civil Court.in contrast, the Plaintiff (by) Counsel's zealous actions in filing a premature motion for a Default Judgment, no response to the Defense letter from July and trying to overwhelm the Defense with legal but burdensome interrogatories is consistent with actions that have burdened fair and equal treatment, under the law, to the point where state courts now must answer to every changing Federal Law in the pursuit of protecting "the individual" and any chance of "the everyday common soul" standing and being heard before a court without expensive legal counsel. The Plaintiff by ounsel, has ignored and consequently missed the opportunity to find common ground with the Defense in discovering just what the truth is in this matter; whether simple error (s) or Identity Theft. Additionally, the Plaintiff by Counsel, has approached this Honorable Court knowing the Defense will seek the legal "firewall" defining the account, in question, as an "Open Account" beyond the Statutes of Limitation. Therefore the Defense begs this Honorable Court to find for the Defense and Dismiss with Prejudice the charges.


Company: Lloyd & McDaniel, PLC For Asset Acceptance
Country: USA
State: Kentucky
City: Louisville
Address: P.O. Box 23200
  <     >  

RELATED COMPLAINTS

Love, Beal & Nixon
Response To My Motion Sueing for credit card debt from 1998

Palisades Collections - Love, Beal & Nixon
Collects default judgments on revolving credit cards debt after the statute of limitations of 3 years in Oklahoma from last date of your payment. Changes dates on your debt. Ripoff

Asset Acceptance
Small claim filed against me how do I respond? Otsego

Love, Beal & Nixon
Lawsuit Ripoff Oklahoma City OKlahoma

Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C
LBN, LB&N Dishonest And In Violation Of Collection Laws

Wolpoff & Abramson, Platinum Financial
Wolpoff & Abramson, Platinum Financial Bank Restraint without any previous legal service for unfamiliar consumer debt

Thomas & Thomas Attorneys At Law
Refusal To Answer Questions Regarding Subject Matte

Shamrock Enterprises, Inc
Stole my money without starting the project!

Midland Credit Management
Being sued for expired debt in Tennessee

Legal Recovery Law Offices, INC
Lrl law offices i answered summons, requested validation and discovery, we went to trial and i prevailed!